A Scottish assisted suicide bill has been defeated in its parliament: 82 - 36.[1]
http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/scotland/critics-blast-assisted-suicide-bill-1.878651
The Bill would have allowed those with terminal or life-shortening illnesses
to end their suffering with the assistance of another person, known as a
"licensed facilitator".
It is being championed by Green MSP Patrick Harvie following the death of independent MSP Margo MacDonald in April 2014.
Alison
Britton, convener of the Law Society's health and medical law
committee, said the organisation was concerned that the Bill lacked
clarity and would be difficult to enforce.
She said: "We have
said throughout the passage of this Bill that legislation in this area
needs to be absolutely clear and those seeking to end their lives, and
those who assist them, need a robust and transparent process to be
certain under which conditions it would be lawful for assistance to be
provided.
"We remain concerned over the lack of definition of the
key terms, such as 'assistance' and 'life-shortening' and the functions
of the licensed facilitator are still uncertain.
"Lack of such clarity leads to ambiguity and leaves the legislation open to interpretation."
* * *
[1] Alex Schadenberg, at http://alexschadenberg.blogspot.com/
Friday, May 29, 2015
Monday, May 18, 2015
Assisted Suicide: How One Woman Chose to Die, Then Survived
http://dailysignal.com/2015/05/18/assisted-suicide-how-one-woman-chose-to-die-then-survived/
Kelsey Harkness /
In 1994, Jeanne Hall, a resident of King City, Ore., voted in favor of Ballot
Measure 16, which for the first time in the United States, would allow
terminally ill patients to end their own lives through physician-assisted
suicide.
“I thought, hey, I wouldn’t want anyone to suffer,” Hall told The Daily Signal. “So I checked it. Then it became legal.”
That day at the ballot box, Hall never could have predicted that more than 15 years later, she would be diagnosed with inoperable colon cancer.
Doctors gave Hall, who was 55 at the time, two options: She could get radiation and chemotherapy and attempt to fight the cancer, or she could take a lethal dose of barbiturates to end her life.
“I was calling it over,” she said. “I wasn’t going to do chemo. When I heard what might take place in radiation "I wasn’t going to do it. I looked for the easy way out.”
Without treatment, Hall was given six months to a year to live, and therefore qualified for physician-assisted suicide through Oregon’s Death With Dignity law.
“She was terminal because she was refusing treatment,” Dr. Kenneth Stevens, one of Hall’s two cancer doctors, told The Daily Signal. “It’s like a person could be considered terminal if they’re not taking [their] insulin or [other] medications.”
Kelsey Harkness / “I thought, hey, I wouldn’t want anyone to suffer,” Hall told The Daily Signal. “So I checked it. Then it became legal.”
That day at the ballot box, Hall never could have predicted that more than 15 years later, she would be diagnosed with inoperable colon cancer.
Doctors gave Hall, who was 55 at the time, two options: She could get radiation and chemotherapy and attempt to fight the cancer, or she could take a lethal dose of barbiturates to end her life.
“I was calling it over,” she said. “I wasn’t going to do chemo. When I heard what might take place in radiation "I wasn’t going to do it. I looked for the easy way out.”
Without treatment, Hall was given six months to a year to live, and therefore qualified for physician-assisted suicide through Oregon’s Death With Dignity law.
“She was terminal because she was refusing treatment,” Dr. Kenneth Stevens, one of Hall’s two cancer doctors, told The Daily Signal. “It’s like a person could be considered terminal if they’re not taking [their] insulin or [other] medications.”
Thursday, May 14, 2015
Final Exit Network, Inc. Guilty in Assisting With Suicide
Dakota County
Attorney James Backstrom announced that a Dakota County Jury has found Final
Exit Network, Inc. guilty of Assisting Another to Commit Suicide and
Interference with a Dead Body or Death Scene in connection with assisting Doreen
Dunn in committing suicide on May 30, 2007 at her home in Apple Valley. The jury
deliberated for less than two hours. Judge Christian Wilton set the sentencing
date for August 24, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in Hastings.
Additional facts pertaining to this case can be found online at: Criminal Complaint Search. To view prior news releases, go to: Attorney News Releases.
Backstrom commented: “What Final Exit Network does in aiding individuals suffering from serious medical conditions who, like Doreen Dunn, are not terminally ill but are extremely vulnerable or depressed, in taking their own lives and then covering up the truth about what occurred to the victim’s family, the medical examiner and law enforcement, is not only legally wrong it is morally reprehensible. We are pleased to have brought this organization to justice for these crimes.”
Backstrom thanked the Apple Valley Police Department and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation who aided in the investigation of this case. Backstrom also thanked Assistant County Attorney Elizabeth Swank and Chief Deputy Phil Prokopowicz who prosecuted the case.
Monday, May 4, 2015
California: Memo to Senate Appropriations Committee: "Vote 'NO' on SB 128: The financial impact is potentially 'enormous.'"
By Margaret K. Dore, Esq., MBA
SB 128 seeks to legalize physician-assisted suicide. The bill is based on a similar law in Oregon, which was enacted in 1997. In Oregon, the law is rarely used, but since passage, there has been a significant increase in other (conventional) suicides. This increase is consistent with a suicide contagion in which legalization and promotion of physician-assisted suicide has led to an increase in other suicides. Moreover, the financial cost is “enormous.” A government report from Oregon states:
In 2010 alone, self-inflicted injury hospitalization charges exceeded 41 million dollars.This Committee must vote NO unless the proponents can show that California will not have a similar increase in conventional suicides. Otherwise, the financial cost in California could be “enormous.”
Sunday, May 3, 2015
California: "SB 128 has the potential for a large and adverse financial impact."
LETTER submitted to the Senate Appropriations Committee (edited for the web):
Please accept this cover letter and memo in opposition to SB 128 for the purpose of the May 11th hearing.
Based on the "Oregon experience," passage of SB 128 has the potential for a large and adverse financial impact on the state of California. The cover letter explains why as follows:
Based on the "Oregon experience," passage of SB 128 has the potential for a large and adverse financial impact on the state of California. The cover letter explains why as follows:
SB 128 seeks to legalize physician-assisted suicide.
In Oregon, which has had a similar law since 1997, legalization is statistically correlated with an increase in other suicides. This increase is consistent with a suicide contagion in which the legalization of one type of suicide (physician-assisted) has led to an increase in other (conventional) suicides. Moreover, the financial cost is "enormous." A government report from Oregon states:
"In 2010 alone, self-inflicted injury hospitalization charges exceeded 41 million dollars." (Emphasis added).Here are the full links:
https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/dore-ltr-ca-sen-appr-com_001.pdf
https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/sb-128-senate-appropriations-memo-updated.pdf
Thank you for your consideration.
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA, President
Choice is an Illusion, a nonprofit corporation
Law Offices of Margaret K. Dore, P.S.
www.choiceillusion.org
www.margaretdore.com
1001 4th Avenue, Suite 4400
Seattle, WA 98154
Monday, April 27, 2015
Vermont: “Repeal the Sunset” Bill Moves Out of Committee
The House Human Services Committee this afternoon voted to approve
S.108, the bill that calls for the repeal of the “sunset provision” in
Act 39 (not to be confused with a wholesale repeal of Act 39). It is
expected that the bill will be debated on the House floor next week,
possibly Wednesday.
“Repealing the sunset” would mean that the law will retain the few so-called protections that were included in the original bill that was passed and became law in 2013. Without a repeal of the sunset, these minimal protections, which primarily relate to the procedure around obtaining a prescription, are scheduled to go away in July 2016. As Guy Page testified last week on behalf of the Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare, “Without the sunset, Act 39 gets an ‘F’. With it, it rates an ‘F-minus’. A distinction without a difference.”
“Repealing the sunset” would mean that the law will retain the few so-called protections that were included in the original bill that was passed and became law in 2013. Without a repeal of the sunset, these minimal protections, which primarily relate to the procedure around obtaining a prescription, are scheduled to go away in July 2016. As Guy Page testified last week on behalf of the Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare, “Without the sunset, Act 39 gets an ‘F’. With it, it rates an ‘F-minus’. A distinction without a difference.”
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Nurse Admits Killing Patients to Ease Her Workload
By John Hall for MailOnline
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3032137/Nurse-Death-Vera-Maresova-admits-murdering-five-patients-potassium-injections.html#ixzz3XJ806uDP
A former nurse in the Czech Republic has admitted murdering six of her elderly patients with massive doses of potassium in order to ease her workload.
Vera Maresova, 50, confessed to killing five women and one man over a four-year period at a hospital in Rumburk - a small town in the north of the country.
Dubbed 'Nurse Death' by local media, Maresova was initially arrested over the death of a 70-year-old woman last August, but has now admitted killing five more people between 2010 and 2014 following a police investigation.
According to the prosecution, Maresova injected the potassium straight into the blood stream of her six elderly patients, which caused them to suffer heart failure and eventually death.
All of her victims were already in the intensive care unit at the hospital and it is believed Maresova thought their deaths would simply be attributed to natural causes.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3032137/Nurse-Death-Vera-Maresova-admits-murdering-five-patients-potassium-injections.html#ixzz3XJ806uDP
A former nurse in the Czech Republic has admitted murdering six of her elderly patients with massive doses of potassium in order to ease her workload.
Vera Maresova, 50, confessed to killing five women and one man over a four-year period at a hospital in Rumburk - a small town in the north of the country.
Dubbed 'Nurse Death' by local media, Maresova was initially arrested over the death of a 70-year-old woman last August, but has now admitted killing five more people between 2010 and 2014 following a police investigation.
According to the prosecution, Maresova injected the potassium straight into the blood stream of her six elderly patients, which caused them to suffer heart failure and eventually death.
All of her victims were already in the intensive care unit at the hospital and it is believed Maresova thought their deaths would simply be attributed to natural causes.
Sunday, April 12, 2015
Alaska: Memo Against HB 99
HB 99 seeks to legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia in Alaska.
The sponsor says that the bill applies to terminally ill patients with an “inevitable and certain death.” Eligible persons, however, may have years, even decades, to live. The bill is, regardless, a recipe for elder abuse, especially for people with money.
Other problems include: steerage to suicide by health care providers; trauma to patients; trauma to family members; and the risk of suicide contagion.
To view a detailed memo arguing against HB 99, please click here. To view the attachments, please click here.
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA
The sponsor says that the bill applies to terminally ill patients with an “inevitable and certain death.” Eligible persons, however, may have years, even decades, to live. The bill is, regardless, a recipe for elder abuse, especially for people with money.
Other problems include: steerage to suicide by health care providers; trauma to patients; trauma to family members; and the risk of suicide contagion.
To view a detailed memo arguing against HB 99, please click here. To view the attachments, please click here.
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA
Choice is an Illusion has a New Website!
The website's purpose is to fight SB 128, which seeks to legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia in California. To view the new website, please click here.
Monday, April 6, 2015
California: Vote NO on SB 128
To read a legal/policy analysis against SB 128, please click here. To view supporting documentation, please click here.
Key points include:
People "eligible" for assisted suicide/euthanasia may have years, even decades, to live, i.e., if they don't die of assisted suicide/euthanasia under SB 128. The bill encourages people with years to live to throw away their lives.
The thrust of SB 128 is to protect doctors and other participants in a patient's death, including family members. This is done in three ways:
Key points include:
People "eligible" for assisted suicide/euthanasia may have years, even decades, to live, i.e., if they don't die of assisted suicide/euthanasia under SB 128. The bill encourages people with years to live to throw away their lives.
The thrust of SB 128 is to protect doctors and other participants in a patient's death, including family members. This is done in three ways:
Monday, March 30, 2015
Montana: Vote "Yes" on HB 477!
HB 477 will reverse Baxter and send a clear message that medical killings are prohibited and against public policy. Individuals will be protected from the medical establishment, individual doctors and family members with something to gain.
A. Involuntary Medical Killings.
Throughout the US, there are increasing reports of involuntary medical killings.[1] Consider a 2012 case against Kaiser Healthcare. Doctors killed the patient, a wealthy older man, through a “terminal extubation.” His daughters had allegedly urged this result in order to obtain large inheritances.[2] In Montana, examples include Dr. James Mungas, who was killed under the guise of hospice/palliative care. His widow, Carol Mungas, states:
Baxter has created confusion in the law and has emboldened some doctors and family members to publicly admit participation in assisted suicides. If HB 477 is not enacted, this situation will likely lead to defacto legality and the following problems:
1. New paths of elder abuse, especially for people with money.
Legal assisted suicide creates new paths of elder abuse. Consider, for example, the Thomas Middleton case, where legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon was part of a financial elder abuse fraud.
2. Steerage to suicide.
It is well documented that Oregon's Medicaid program steers patients to suicide (suicide is covered in lieu of treatments for cure or to extend life). Private health plans and providers have this same ability. To learn more, see this affidavit by Oregon doctor, Kenneth Stevens, MD.
3. Pressure on patients.
See this letter by Marlene Deakins, RN, describing the pressure put on her brother after he merely asked a question about assisted suicide in Washington State.
4. More conventional suicides, including violent suicides.
In Oregon, conventional suicides, including violent suicides, have substantially increased with legalization of assisted suicide. This is consistent with a suicide contagion. The financial cost of these suicides is "enormous." For more information, click here.
5. Pressure to expand to non-terminal people.
In Washington state, there have been "trial balloon" proposals to expand its law to non-terminal people, including those who have simply fallen on hard times. See e.g., this column in the Seattle Times, suggesting euthanasia for people without money for their old age.
Contact your legislators and urge them to vote "YES" on HB 477.
* * *
[1] Peter Whoriskey, "As More Hospices Enroll Patients who Aren't Dying, Questions About Lethal Doses Arise," The Washington Post, August 21, 2014.
[2] William Dotinga, “Grim Complaint Against Kaiser Hospital,” Feb. 6, 2012.
[3] Carol Mungas, athttp://www.montanansagainstassistedsuicide.org/2013/03/i-support-house-bill-505-which-clearly.html
A. Involuntary Medical Killings.
Throughout the US, there are increasing reports of involuntary medical killings.[1] Consider a 2012 case against Kaiser Healthcare. Doctors killed the patient, a wealthy older man, through a “terminal extubation.” His daughters had allegedly urged this result in order to obtain large inheritances.[2] In Montana, examples include Dr. James Mungas, who was killed under the guise of hospice/palliative care. His widow, Carol Mungas, states:
It is traumatic, still, to realize his last communications were attempts to get help.[3]B. Likely Problems
Baxter has created confusion in the law and has emboldened some doctors and family members to publicly admit participation in assisted suicides. If HB 477 is not enacted, this situation will likely lead to defacto legality and the following problems:
1. New paths of elder abuse, especially for people with money.
Legal assisted suicide creates new paths of elder abuse. Consider, for example, the Thomas Middleton case, where legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon was part of a financial elder abuse fraud.
2. Steerage to suicide.
It is well documented that Oregon's Medicaid program steers patients to suicide (suicide is covered in lieu of treatments for cure or to extend life). Private health plans and providers have this same ability. To learn more, see this affidavit by Oregon doctor, Kenneth Stevens, MD.
3. Pressure on patients.
See this letter by Marlene Deakins, RN, describing the pressure put on her brother after he merely asked a question about assisted suicide in Washington State.
4. More conventional suicides, including violent suicides.
In Oregon, conventional suicides, including violent suicides, have substantially increased with legalization of assisted suicide. This is consistent with a suicide contagion. The financial cost of these suicides is "enormous." For more information, click here.
5. Pressure to expand to non-terminal people.
In Washington state, there have been "trial balloon" proposals to expand its law to non-terminal people, including those who have simply fallen on hard times. See e.g., this column in the Seattle Times, suggesting euthanasia for people without money for their old age.
C. Contact Your Legislators.
Contact your legislators and urge them to vote "YES" on HB 477.
* * *
[1] Peter Whoriskey, "As More Hospices Enroll Patients who Aren't Dying, Questions About Lethal Doses Arise," The Washington Post, August 21, 2014.
[2] William Dotinga, “Grim Complaint Against Kaiser Hospital,” Feb. 6, 2012.
[3] Carol Mungas, athttp://www.montanansagainstassistedsuicide.org/2013/03/i-support-house-bill-505-which-clearly.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)