![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYq3a3gbKBWdRrvazWbDCfR9XYz4GSX7y0ws4841zTU9yavCWElN9qp2ZYsS-K7isfm2zXjvd3pSRQ86bizZnir1ySsiLlYEe6l8Rb7bAx8bwQuneYSGNk8fFCYS7gxWsVDR3FtguQzWc/s200/Riverside+Courthouse.jpg)
The act remains null and void. For more information, click here
![]() |
"Euthanasia is a recipe for elder abuse." |
(a) A person who feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent is not entitled to any of the following:
(1) Any property, interest, or benefit under a will of the decedent, or a trust created by or for the benefit of the decedent or in which the decedent has an interest ... [2]
![]() |
Alexandra Snyder, Esq. |
The Court held the End of Life Option Act ("Act") was passed by a special session of the Legislature in violation of Article IV § 3(b) of the California Constitution because the Act is not encompassed by any "reasonable construction" of the Proclamation granting the special session the authority to legislate. The Court therefore held that the Act was void as unconstitutional.
![]() |
Raymond Hoa, MP |